Bringing you the lessons learned from thousands of hours working as a therapist and coach so that you can turn inspiration into action, live life with purpose, promote self awareness, and level up your impact each week. Join us each today by entering your email below!
Share
One Percent Better | Why You Can’t Motivate People, Springboards, and Biases
Published 26 days ago • 3 min read
ONE PERCENT BETTER
Sharing small mental health & performance coaching insights to help you win each week -- all in 3 mins or less.
Why You Can’t Motivate People, Springboards, and Biases
We would like to think we’re pretty rational thinkers. As leaders and growth chasers, we’ll evaluate our options, think critically about predicting what actions we should take to control our destiny and respond versus react.
Nobel Prize winning Daniel Kahneman, who passed away in 2024, would argue that we’re far less rational than we’d like to think we are. He and Amos Tversky wrote about this concept in Thinking, Fast and Slowwhich suggests that humans have two systems of thinking – fast thinking and slow thinking. While most of the time we think we’re engaged in slow thinking, much of our experience is actually in fast thinking – gut feelings, intuition and the subconscious seeking of patterns. Kahneman and Tversky popularized several human biases (see list below**) – and Kahneman specifically highlights a fascinating concept regarding motivation in one of my favorite podcast series The Knowledge Project. This concept on motivation is what we'll be breaking down this week.
**Key Biases from Kahneman & Tversky:
Anchoring Effect – Relying too heavily on the first piece of information offered. Availability Heuristic – Estimating likelihood based on ease of recall. Representativeness Heuristic – Using stereotypes/patterns over statistical reasoning. Substitution – Answering an easier question in place of a harder one without realizing it.
Loss Aversion – Losses feel more painful than equivalent gains feel good. Endowment Effect – Valuing things more simply because you own them. Framing Effect – Different decisions depending on whether options are framed as gains or losses. Certainty Effect – Overweighting outcomes that are certain compared to those that are merely probable. Possibility Effect – Overweighting small probabilities (e.g., lottery tickets).
Risk Aversion in Gains / Risk Seeking in Losses – Preferring sure gains but gambling to avoid sure losses.
Here’s the thing – you think you can change people. We all do. From the clients we work with, to the family members we disagree with, to that service representative you wished would have been nicer, we think we have more control over people’s motivations than we actually do. The TLDR on Kahneman’s conversation suggests that motivation exists on two poles – either push people or remove constraints, the latter of which is something I’d challenge us all to do a bit more of in our daily/weekly work with others.
Pushing people is something you already do. Push people to go to the gym, push people to not yell, push people to move faster in line, push people to get their work done on time, push kids to do their homework, push family to respect your boundaries, push your spouse to…well, let’s not touch that last one, but I’m sure there’s some pushing happening there.
Stop pushing. Rather, ask:
“Why aren’t they doing the desired behavior already?”
This week, take some accountability on the situation you’re in with the person you’re trying to push and think about constraints instead.
Pushing people to go to the gym? Ask yourself why they might not be going already and figure out what you can do to ease the constraints that make going for them difficult.
Pushing people to stop yelling? Ask yourself why they might be yelling in the first place, consider what it is that YOU ARE doing to cause them to yell, and remove the constraints that might be contributing to it occurring.
Pushing kids to do their homework? Ask yourself what is causing them to not do it, and remove those constraints.
Kahneman expands on this notion by conjuring up an image of a board suspended by two springs on either side (Figure 1).
Figure 1: A springboard with even tension on both springs.
If you were to “push” the board down, you are in effect adding tension to a spring. By adding tension, you’re disrupting the equilibrium as one spring gets more compressed than the other (Figure 2).
Figure 2: A springboard with added tension on one side -- the "push effect".
Conversely, if you remove the restraining force on either side, then there’s less tension on both springs and greater equilibrium in the system overall (Figure 3).
Figure 3: A springboard with less tension between springs -- the "removing of constraints" effect.
In essence, the lesson is this: you can certainly still get gains by pushing – but beware – you’re creating more tension in the overall system that makes it difficult to sustain. By thinking about critically removing tension and eliminating the restraining forces, you’re creating more equilibrium in the system, and thus more sustainability.
Pushing people will work, but not forever, and not in way that is sustainable.
Better to think about creating the conditions for motivation to occur, than trying to force it. Afterall, human psychology is far more complex than we give it credit sometimes.
ICYMI
I built a totally FREE career coaching AI agent to help you with your process. Backed by over 1000 pages of literature I use in my work with clients, this tool can help you:
Get practical insights you can use right away — each week, I’ll send you quick, actionable insights from my work as a licensed therapist, mental performance coach, and educator.
Licensed Therapist, Performance Coach, Educator & Mental Health Expert
Bringing you the lessons learned from thousands of hours working as a therapist and coach so that you can turn inspiration into action, live life with purpose, promote self awareness, and level up your impact each week. Join us each today by entering your email below!
ONE PERCENT BETTER Sharing small mental health & performance coaching insights to help you win each week -- all in 3 mins or less. Who Not to Hire, Who to Keep, and 3 Simple Hiring Rules 3 Heuristics for Hiring I once was interviewed for a podcast and the interviewer asked what my hiring process was like as the Chief Operating Officer for a mental health organization and Founder of a group practice. He didn’t like how simple my answers were, because frankly, it doesn’t have to be that...
ONE PERCENT BETTER Sharing small mental health & performance coaching insights to help you win each week -- all in 3 mins or less. Mongolian Horses, The First Day of School & Lessons in Survival The Mongolian people have an incredibly strong tie to horses. Much like the West’s relationship with dogs, Mongolians have a deep cultural connection to horses. As just one measure for their appreciation for the animal, they have over 500 words in the Mongolian language to describe horse traits and...
ONE PERCENT BETTER Sharing small mental health & performance coaching insights to help you win each week -- all in 3 mins or less. Helicopters, Goggles and Why The Best Leave Nothing to Chance The Baltimore Ravens team can’t swim. Well, according to Marlon Humphrey’s and a few of his teammates, technically 1 out 3 can’t swim. So Humphrey and a handful of players reached out to Olympic great, Michael Phelps, on the 29th of July, to ask for his help. Phelps was obliged to not only teach them...